Business requirements can be different and change frequently in the process, so it’s important to create an architecture that is flexible, scalable and maintainable. It’s also key that everyone, like team members and clients, understands the project clearly. To avoid extensive documentation, frequent meetings, and continuous refinements, we employ the following architectural approaches. This post explores the advantages of popular architectures and helps you choose the best solution to meet your unique requirements. A lot of people think that the architectures listed below are just “folder structures”, which is only kind of true. In fact, if you look deeper into them, there are several important aspects: Modular Cooperation, Improved Project Navigation, Separation of Business Logic from UI Components, DRY, and DAC. Take a look at the following diagram — we’re focusing on the area in the bottom right corner, where these principles come together most effectively. Classic architecture, also known as an approach without architecture, can lead to challenges as the application grows. Components overuse and scattered app logic are common issues that arise. This post analyzes classic architecture and provides insights into popular architectures such as Component-based, MVC, Flux, and Microservices architectures. Each architecture is explained in detail, highlighting its benefits and practical use cases. By understanding the advantages and limitations of each architecture, you can make an informed decision on the best approach for your specific project requirements. Whether you’re building a small-scale project or a complex enterprise application, choosing the right architecture is crucial for long-term success. Stay tuned for more insights on modern Front-end application architectures and best practices.